Greater Flamingo in Bundala Year 1986 Uditha Wijesena |
Sri Lanka is unique in its
geographic positioning with regard to World Bird Migration. Breeding birds in the Northern hemisphere migrate to the equatorial regions in the wintery season
and back to their breeding grounds in spring and summer. Ornithologist and
biologists the world over have studied these bird migratory patterns and developed
a set of regular routes called flyways. Almost
always these flyways end up with a landmass beyond which is the southern sea
that extended all the way to the South Pole.
Sri Lanka therefore
is the last landmass in the Central Asian Flyway. Thus the arid zone in the
extreme southern district of Hambantota with the Bundala Wetlands and the dry zone shrub jungle habitat of the Yala National Park has been a heaven and the last staging post for the migratory birds in the Central Asian Flyway. The concentration of
waterfowl in the Bundala wetlands which comprise of three large brackish water-bodies
the Bundala, Embilakala and the Malala lagoons were declared a Wetland of
International Importance (RAMSAR Site) on 15th June 1990, and it was
the first such to be declared in Sri Lanka and Bundala was the 487 th site in the world. Today
Sri Lanka has 6 sites declared as Internationally Important Wetlands listed
under RAMSAR.
World Migratory Bird Flyways |
The description of Bundala under
Sri Lanka and its importance in the listing is cited as follows:
“Southern Province; 6,210 ha; 06°10'N 081°12'E. Flora and Fauna
Sanctuary. Four shallow, brackish lagoons and saltpans interconnected by
channels with associated marshes, dunes and scrub. It is the most important
wintering site in southern Sri Lanka for migratory shorebirds, regularly
holding over 15,000 individuals of various species, and provides habitat for
rare and threatened water bird species. Human activities include commercial
salt extraction, subsistence fishing, wildlife tourism, livestock grazing, and
firewood collection. Ramsar site no. 487. Most recent RIS information: 1990.”
Bundala a Protected Area
Bundala records to a very
ancient village in the Hambantota District and the famous Assist Government
Agent Leonard Woolf’s administrative reports and diaries refer to the fauna and
flora and the struggle for existence of its people in a very dry harsh climate.
Bundala and its vicinity among the four lagoons however was declared a wildlife
sanctuary in December 1969 and remained thus until the area was upgraded to a
National Park in January 1993. This brought a stop to all human activity in an
area of 2600 hectares requiring relocation of some parts of the ancient
village. Later in 2004 it was regazetted with a reduced land area of 3700 hectares
and today Bundala is the recipient of numerous other declarations. A “Man and
Biosphere Reserve by the UNESCO in 2005 and “Bundala-Wilmanna Sanctuary” in
January 2006 identifying a buffer zone of a further 3696 hectares of land
adjacent to the National Park.
Though Bundala today is
recognized internationally as a final staging post for migratory waterfowl; the
actual story of Bundala is but alarming and tragic. If one is to reconsider why
Bundala required recognition and protection it could be said without any doubt
it was its pristine saline habitat and the wondrous number of waterfowl that
frequented the location annually. If it was to be the current condition then
Bundala would take time to qualify to a RAMSAR status.
However Bundala was only a
sanctuary where the people coexisted with the fauna and flora blending with the
sustenance cultivation of paddies in the limited freshwater and with a
controlled slash and burn cultivation in the short rainy season from November
to January. It was so when it was declared a RAMSAR site in 1990. No human
elephant conflicts heard as today and there was never a case where the waterfowl
was exploited or disturbed by the villages.
Much earlier to this period it
was the occasional trigger happy privileged sportsman who did visit Bundala with a
licensed fire arm and a permit from the Government Agent Hambantota to shoot
ducks. This habit too ended with the Amendment to the Flora & Fauna Act in
1964. Outside the sportsman it was the genuine nature lover and birdwatcher
that did come all the way from Colombo to record the waterfowl and the
magnificent Greater Flamingo migration to Bundala. There was hardly a lodging
available in the area except for the Government Rest House in Hambantota or
Thissamaharama.
Commercialized safaris did
take place in a very small way from the early 1970’s with a few jeeps less than
10 in number that operated from Thissamaharama for the foreign tourist who came
to visit the Yala National Park. They were then offered a bonus to see the Greater
Flamingo in Bundala for an extra paltry sum the jeep driver charged for an
extended drive to Bundala via Krinda without any entry fee. These jeep even
then were marked as “Flamingo Safari”.
It should be noted that these jeep
tours started in Thissamaharama was a substitution to an enterprising
personality the famous ‘Tennis Ace’ D. D. N Sevadorai who brought his European
and Scandinavian clientele on camping tours to Thissamaharama / Yala in jeeps with
all the paraphernalia; tents, cutlery, crockery and even the spotless white
table linen all the way from Colombo in the late 60’s and early 70’s. It is
ironical to say that it was these humble beginnings of jeep tours that has
turned in to a jeep mafia run by the local political goons today.
National Parks in Sri Lanka
It is not wrong to say the
most Wildlife National Parks in the country have come up not with the sheer interest
for wildlife protection or habitat protection but with the greed for the revenue
from the entry fees. There was only two National parks the Yala and Wilpattu
declared in 1938 until Galoya was declared in 1954. Large scale Development
Projects like the Galoya and the Mahavelli Multipurpose Development Schemes did
require protected areas for the displaced fauna when large jungle tracts were
opened up for settlement. The 1970’s saw
two more National Parks the Yala East and the Udawalawe being declared. The
accelerated Mahavelli scheme carved out four National Parks in Maduru Oya,
Wasgamuwa, and the Mahavelli Floodplains in Somawathiya. Them being mainly to
hold the displaced Elephant population.
Today there are 26 National
parks with 15 of them named after Bundala was declared in 1993. It could be
clearly said that Bundala, Minneriya and Kaudulla were localities where the
tourism trade blossomed and the local hotels in Habarana and Thissamaharama
arranged localized jeep safaris to see wild elephants and birds. This triggered
off the Department of Wildlife Conservation [DWLC] to fence up ticketing booths
and gazette a boundary demarcating a National Park. National Parks are said to
be the largest revenue collectors outside the Department of Customs in this
country. As recorded by the DWLC the Yala National Park itself has generated
Rs. 612 Million as revenue during the period from January 2018 to October 2018. However
it should be noted that these monies all end up in the Government Consolidated
Fund and only a meager portion is utilized on the welfare of the fauna and its
protection.
Bundala is affected by the KOIS Project
The upgrading of Bundala to a
National Park in 1993 could be viewed only as a significance to it being
declared a RAMSAR site in 1990 or as said before the revenue from entry permits
from an already established localized wildlife tour operation. It is noted that
most RAMSAR sites the world over are not strict reserves but where human
activity coexist with a faunal presence. That was basically how Bundala became
a RAMSAR site with its abundance of waterfowl until about 1989-90 when trouble
started.
The then political ideology to
open up large scale development projects primarily for political stability
required a similar project as the Accelerated Mahavelli Scheme in the North
Central Sri Lanka in the South as well. This was also highlight in a Commission
Report on the 1971 youth unrest and the insurgency that originated in the
South. The result being the Kirindi Oya Irrigation and Settlement Project [KOISP],
or better known as the Lunugamwehera Reservoir project. The proposed KOISP Right
Bank Canal [RBC] was to extend all the way to the Badagiriya Tank the then existent
last paddy tract on the Malala Ara basin.
The KOISP performed below
expectations with the expected water yields not achieved and messing up
cropping patterns. It is rumored of a mix up of flood records where isolated
heavy flooded years being considered for yield calculations when they should
have been left out as outliers. The Right Bank Canal [RBC] planned to feed the
Badagiriya Tank had to stop short of the Badagiriya Tank and the Tracks 3 &
4 located just above the Bundala Lagoon be abandoned due to the water deficiency.
The feasibility report on the
KOISP did say that the land was not the best suited for paddy but for other
fiber crops. The political administration and the settlers were adamant to
develop the land for paddy with the misconception that the already existent 5
tank irrigation scheme in the lower areas with alluvial soils did give
favorable yields. Today people have started moving to highland crops as banana
and gherkin instead.
The drainage water from Tracks
1, 2, 5 & 6 were confined above the A2 road trace from Hambantota to
Weerawila and are flowing into the Embilakala and the Malala Lagoons. The
salinity in both these waterbodies dropped with the swelling water levels. The favored
brackish water for the aquatic organism diminished bringing a total change in the
ecology. This high water level in the Malala Lagoon was controlled to a certain
aspect by providing a permanent opening into the sea through an outfall canal
and groyne constructed into the sea.
A performance audit report compiled
in the year 2000 for the KOISP refers to the environment in a very short paragraph
thus ….
“The environmental record is mixed with some significant disbenefits,
notably a reduction in salinity of the ecologically valuable coastal lagoons.
However, the human environment within the command area is now aesthetically
attractive compared to adjoining slash and burn agricultural areas, while
malaria incidence is reported to have fallen significantly.”
Even though the effects of excessive
drainage is seen only in the Embilakala and the Malala Lagoons it is strange to
note an ecological effect on the Bundala Lagoon as well even though Bundala is located
slightly higher in a different catchment. It would have been of the same fate had
the tracks 3 & 4 being opened for paddies which would have drained directly
into the Bundala Lagoon.
The mystery behind the Bundala Flamingo and change in Ecology
Bundala had but a flagship
species the Flamingo. Of all the issues that Bundala faces today from human
activity within the park to the invasive flora of Prosopis Julifora, commonly known as ‘Kalapu Andara’ in and around
the wetland it is the missing Greater Flamingo that is to be of significance to
everyone.
Flamingos are all members of
the Phoenicopteridae bird family and
are six species; American (Caribbean) Flamingo (Phoenicopterus ruber), Andean
Flamingo (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Chilean Flamingo (Phoenicopterus chilensis),
Greater Flamingo (Phoenicopterus roseus), Lesser Flamingo (Phoeniconaias
minor), Puna (James's) Flamingo (Phoenicoparrus jamesi). Of the six species
Lesser Flamingo is the most numerous followed by the Greater Flamingo. The
other four species are confined to the new world in the Americas. Sri Lanka is
frequented by the Greater Flamingo a winter migrant from the Indian Rann of
Kutch, a salt marsh in the Thar Desert in the Kutch District of Gujarat.
Pic Courtesy: https://birdeden.com/what-do-flamingos-eat |
Flamingos are said to be monogamous
and lay only a single egg each year. If the egg fails to hatch or is predated
they do not lay a replacement and can take several years to recover their
population. However in the year 1997, a photograph published in a local
newspaper of the Bundala flamingos’ nest-mounds did arouse interest among the bird
enthusiasts. They never did lay and this development was thought to be an instinctive
practice before returning to their customary breeding grounds.
It is noted that all this
activity related to the Bundala flamingo came to an end in the
mid-nineties. There had been consecutive
dry years where the lagoon was almost dry and ever since the drainage water
came into the lagoons the alkaline ecology was affected. In return the Asian Development Bank which
was the funding agency for the KOISP did take up the task in analyzing and
researching as to what went wrong in Bundala. But it was always with the focus
of the quality of the discharge water and its biological acceptability as a discharge
into surface waterbodies.
It is speculated that the
Bundala lagoon has had no direct effect of the KOISP drainage discharge in to
the lagoon as the tracts 3 & 4 are abandoned and therefore the reason for
the missing Flamingo is not directly related to drainage discharges. There are
other thoughts as well, when the saltern was made to stop letting brine water
enter the lagoon which in return affected the artemia cysts growth the
preferred food of the Greater Flamingo.
However as of present there
has been no research done to ascertain the reason for the Flamingo to abandon
Bundala and on a broader sense the whole of South and South/Eastern Sri Lanka. The Flamingo
then was not confined to Bundala but did frequent all the southern salterns;
the Maha lewaya in the Hambantota town and even the Karagan Lewaya which today
has been converted into an inland harbor. They did frequent the Palatupane
Lewaya in the immediate outskirts of the Yala National Park entrance.
However it should be noted
that the flamingo is highly dependent on diet which is only found in abundance
in highly alkaline concentrated water bodies and the change in the ecology does affect
their survival drastically.
There had been similar
incidents elsewhere. The Lesser Flamingo
is flying off, and fleeing a seemingly shrinking Lake Nakuru, the home that has
sheltered them for uncounted centuries in the Lake Nakuru National Park in Kenya.
The lake is drying and the receding shoreline result for many hundreds of dead
flamingos littering the caked lakebed. The catchment area around Nakuru has
been heavily deforested, and its rivers are running dry. Years of drought have
further reduced the water supply. Global temperatures are rising and local sewer
and industrial runoff from nearby Nakuru town is polluting the lake. This
shallow lake and its shrinking flamingo population remains a complex question.
The simplest answer is but its favoured food the blue-green algae has
diminished within the lake and is no longer produced in that habitat ….again a
change in the ecology.
Therefore we can draw
similarities of Lake Nakuru with Bundala. The only difference being that the
Lesser Flamingo of Lake Nakuru was a breeding resident while our Greater
Flamingo is a migrant from the Rann of Kutch.
However they are quite in abundance in the Northern peninsular, the
Mannar salterns and other alkaline lagoons and shallow seas around. But for the
Greater Flamingo to abandon the South and the South/Eastern Sri Lanka is not really an issue
related to the ecological change that Bundala underwent as a result of the
KOISP.
So let’s be optimistic that
they would come back someday once things are favorable for them or until the
reasons for the loss of its favoured food source in the southern saltpans are found
out through a comprehensive study.
Sad.The reason should be found.And corrected if possible.
ReplyDeleteVery useful article Uditha specially for the young
ReplyDeletenaturalists who engage in these areas!
Thank you very much for the article! I live in Tissamaharama and work as a Naturalist.
ReplyDelete